Nigeria’s House of Representatives has summoned the chief executives of MTN Nigeria, Airtel Nigeria, Globacom and Mafab Communications to explain persistent complaints about poor telecommunications services, escalating pressure on operators to improve network reliability.

The lawmakers have directed the executives to appear before an ad hoc committee on October 28, 2026, as concerns grow over dropped calls, unreliable internet connections and the quality of service subscribers receive despite significant investment in telecommunications infrastructure.

The investigation puts a longstanding issue at the centre of the national conversation: why does reliable connectivity remain difficult for many Nigerians when mobile networks have become essential to everyday business and communication?


What Happened?

The House of Representatives issued the summons on October 21, directing the telecom operators to explain the persistent service problems reported by subscribers.

According to Techpoint Africa, the investigation covers network quality complaints and the measures operators are taking to improve service. The committee has warned that further action could follow if executives fail to attend.

The concerns extend beyond slow internet browsing. Mobile connectivity supports bank transfers, point-of-sale terminals, online learning, remote work, e-commerce and customer communications.

When networks fail, the effects can spread from individual subscribers to businesses that depend on mobile data to complete transactions and serve customers.


The Bigger Context

Nigeria’s telecommunications industry has invested heavily in expanding and maintaining its networks, but infrastructure challenges remain.

The Nigerian Communications Commission recorded 44,678 fibre-optic cable cuts between January and September 2026, according to figures cited by Techpoint Africa. The reported incidents included cable degradation, vandalism and other disruptions. The commission also recorded thousands of cases involving denied access to telecommunications infrastructure and equipment theft.

These problems can affect network performance even when operators are spending money on upgrades.

Telecommunications infrastructure requires more than mobile towers. Operators depend on fibre connections, electricity, transmission equipment, secure access to sites and maintenance teams that can repair faults quickly.

This means network quality is influenced by operators, infrastructure providers, regulators and other organisations whose activities affect the deployment and maintenance of telecommunications equipment.


Why It Matters

For consumers, unreliable connectivity costs time and can interrupt essential services.

A failed transaction can leave a customer uncertain about whether money has been transferred. A small business may lose a sale when a payment terminal cannot connect. Students and remote workers may struggle to complete tasks when internet access becomes inconsistent.

The problem also affects trust. Customers expect to be able to make calls, send messages and access online services without repeatedly searching for a stronger signal.

For businesses operating online, connectivity is not simply a convenience. It is part of their operating infrastructure.

The parliamentary investigation could therefore help bring attention to a problem that affects far more than telecommunications companies themselves.


Industry Impact

The hearing could increase pressure on operators to explain the gap between infrastructure spending and the service subscribers experience.

Telecommunications operators and tower companies reportedly invested ₦2.53 trillion in network infrastructure during 2025, with a further ₦1.86 trillion earmarked for 2026, according to figures cited by Techpoint Africa. Meanwhile, the Nigerian Communications Commission recorded more than 413,000 consumer complaints during the first half of 2026.

The figures underline the difficulty of translating infrastructure investment into consistent service quality.

For operators, the challenge is to maintain existing equipment, expand capacity and resolve faults while dealing with security risks, rising operating costs and infrastructure access problems.

For regulators, the challenge is to determine which problems operators can reasonably prevent, whether service standards are being met and what corrective measures are necessary.


What We Know—and What Remains Unclear

The House has summoned the operators for an October 28 hearing, and the investigation follows continuing consumer complaints about network quality.

However, the hearing has not yet taken place, so the operators’ explanations and any resulting decisions remain unknown.

The figures on fibre cuts, infrastructure investment and consumer complaints also describe different aspects of the problem. They should not be treated as proof that one company is solely responsible for poor service.

A clearer assessment will require operators to explain their individual network performance, the causes of disruptions and the steps being taken to address recurring problems.


What’s Next?

The next major development is the scheduled hearing on October 28.

The committee will have an opportunity to question the operators about network performance, infrastructure spending and their plans for improving service.

Subscribers will be watching for more than assurances. They need clear explanations of persistent problems, realistic improvement timelines and evidence that corrective action is making a difference.

The Nigerian Communications Commission’s existing quality-of-service rules and consumer-protection measures will also remain important in determining how operators are held accountable.


Editorial Insight

Nigeria’s network quality debate highlights a basic truth about digital development: expanding access is only half the job.

People also need connectivity that works consistently enough for them to use digital payments, run businesses, study and communicate without unnecessary disruption.

The infrastructure challenges are real, but they should not become a permanent excuse for poor service. Operators need to explain what is within their control, regulators need to enforce appropriate standards, and infrastructure-related problems require coordinated solutions.

The October 28 hearing will be useful if it moves the conversation beyond complaints and investment figures toward measurable improvements.

For subscribers, the real outcome is simple: fewer failed connections, more reliable internet access and better value for the money they spend.


Read More


Related Articles